<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Knowledge Hub Networks &#187; Employee Benefits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/category/human-resources/benefits-healthcare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com</link>
	<description>Business Blogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:26:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PBGC Releases Revised Proposed Regulations Addressing Reportable Event Requirements under ERISA</title>
		<link>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/pbgc-releases-revised-proposed-regulations-addressing-reportable-event-requirements-under-erisa/</link>
		<comments>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/pbgc-releases-revised-proposed-regulations-addressing-reportable-event-requirements-under-erisa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McDermott Will &#38; Emery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBGC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 4043]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employeebenefitsblog.com/2013/06/articles/retirement-plans/pbgc-releases-revised-proposed-regulations-addressing-reportable-event-requirements-under-erisa/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
by Paul J. Compernolle, Ashley McCarthy and Maureen O&#8217;Brien

Section 4043 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) requires pension plan sponsors to report a variety of corporate and plan events to the Pension Benefit Guara...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/pbgc-releases-revised-proposed-regulations-addressing-reportable-event-requirements-under-erisa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>France Allows Same-Sex Marriages</title>
		<link>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/france-allows-same-sex-marriages/</link>
		<comments>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/france-allows-same-sex-marriages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McDermott Will &#38; Emery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law No.2013-404]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law No.99-94]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PACS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employeebenefitsblog.com/2013/06/articles/employment/france-allows-samesex-marriages/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Lionel Lesur and Lisa A. Linsky
&#160;
On April 23, 2013, the French Parliament gave final approval to a bill allowing same-sex couples to get married and adopt children. &#160;This makes France the 14th country in the world to legalize marriage bet...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/france-allows-same-sex-marriages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Final ACA Wellness Rules Issued</title>
		<link>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/final-aca-wellness-rules-issued/</link>
		<comments>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/final-aca-wellness-rules-issued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 21:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McDermott Will &#38; Emery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health and Welfare Plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health-contingent wellness programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIPAA nondiscrimination requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory wellness programs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employeebenefitsblog.com/2013/06/articles/health-and-welfare-plans/final-aca-wellness-rules-issued/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Amy Gordon and Jamie Weyeneth
On May 29, the U.S. Departments of the Treasury, Labor (DOL) and Health and Human Services issued final regulations amending the 2006 HIPAA nondiscrimination wellness regulations to implement the employer wellness progr...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/final-aca-wellness-rules-issued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Oral Arguments on DOMA, Proposition 8: Potential Employee Benefit Plan Implications</title>
		<link>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/supreme-court-oral-arguments-on-doma-proposition-8-potential-employee-benefit-plan-implications/</link>
		<comments>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/supreme-court-oral-arguments-on-doma-proposition-8-potential-employee-benefit-plan-implications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 21:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McDermott Will &#38; Emery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health and Welfare Plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex spouses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spousal benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employeebenefitsblog.com/2013/06/articles/health-and-welfare-plans/supreme-court-oral-arguments-on-doma-proposition-8-potential-employee-benefit-plan-implications/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Joseph S. Adams, Todd A. Solomon and Brian J. Tiemann
On March 26 and 27, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in cases challenging the constitutionality of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and California&#38;rsquo...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/supreme-court-oral-arguments-on-doma-proposition-8-potential-employee-benefit-plan-implications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update on The Proposed European Cap on Bank Bonuses</title>
		<link>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/update-on-the-proposed-european-cap-on-bank-bonuses/</link>
		<comments>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/update-on-the-proposed-european-cap-on-bank-bonuses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 16:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McDermott Will &#38; Emery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employeebenefitsblog.com/2013/05/articles/employment/update-on-the-proposed-european-cap-on-bank-bonuses/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Katie Clark and James Noble
Following recent discussions on this topic, lawmakers in the European Parliament have now adopted legislation intended to cap the value of bonuses paid to certain bank staff.
Background 
The measure forms part of the Capi...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/update-on-the-proposed-european-cap-on-bank-bonuses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Notice of Coverage Options Available Through the Exchanges</title>
		<link>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/notice-of-coverage-options-available-through-the-exchanges/</link>
		<comments>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/notice-of-coverage-options-available-through-the-exchanges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McDermott Will &#38; Emery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health and Welfare Plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance Exchanges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employeebenefitsblog.com/2013/05/articles/health-and-welfare-plans/notice-of-coverage-options-available-through-the-exchanges/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Amy M. Gordon
On May 8, 2013, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) published Technical Release No. 2013-02, which provides temporary guidance addressing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's (ACA) required notice to employees regarding thei...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/notice-of-coverage-options-available-through-the-exchanges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Favorable Temporary ACA Exemption for Expatriate Health Plans</title>
		<link>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/favorable-temporary-aca-exemption-for-expatriate-health-plans/</link>
		<comments>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/favorable-temporary-aca-exemption-for-expatriate-health-plans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McDermott Will &#38; Emery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expatriate health plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health and Welfare Plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minimum essential coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patient Protection Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transitional relief]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employeebenefitsblog.com/2013/05/articles/health-and-welfare-plans/favorable-temporary-aca-exemption-for-expatriate-health-plans/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Amy M. Gordon, Megan Mardy and Todd A. Solomon
Recently issued guidance addresses the unique compliance issues surrounding expatriate health plans under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, as amended by the Health Care and Educat...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/favorable-temporary-aca-exemption-for-expatriate-health-plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Additional Guidance Issued on Summary of Benefits and Coverage Disclosure Requirements</title>
		<link>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/additional-guidance-issued-on-summary-of-benefits-and-coverage-disclosure-requirements/</link>
		<comments>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/additional-guidance-issued-on-summary-of-benefits-and-coverage-disclosure-requirements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 20:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McDermott Will &#38; Emery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[group health plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health and Welfare Plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SBC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employeebenefitsblog.com/2013/05/articles/health-and-welfare-plans/additional-guidance-issued-on-summary-of-benefits-and-coverage-disclosure-requirements/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Amy M. Gordon and Joanna C. Kerpen
The U.S. Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and the Treasury recently issued new guidance and templates regarding the summary of benefits and coverage requirement under the Patient Protection and Affo...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/additional-guidance-issued-on-summary-of-benefits-and-coverage-disclosure-requirements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employers Should Review How Plan Documents Define Spouse in Light of Recent Benefits Litigation</title>
		<link>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/employers-should-review-how-plan-documents-define-spouse-in-light-of-recent-benefits-litigation/</link>
		<comments>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/employers-should-review-how-plan-documents-define-spouse-in-light-of-recent-benefits-litigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 15:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McDermott Will &#38; Emery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health and Welfare Plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex spouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employeebenefitsblog.com/2013/05/articles/health-and-welfare-plans/employers-should-review-how-plan-documents-define-spouse-in-light-of-recent-benefits-litigation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>by <a href="http://www.mwe.com/Lisa-K-Loesel/">Lisa K. Loesel</a>, <a href="http://www.mwe.com/Todd-A-Solomon/">Todd A. Solomon</a>, <a href="http://www.mwe.com/Jacob-Mattinson/">Jacob Mattinson</a> and <a href="http://www.mwe.com/Brian-J-Tiemann/">Brian J. Tiemann</a></p>
<p>Two recent cases challenging benefit eligibility for same-sex spouses highlight the need for employer-sponsored retirement and welfare plans to clearly define "spouse" for eligibility purposes. Employers may want to review their plan documents to determine whether plan amendments are needed to clarify benefit eligibility for same-sex spouses in light of the upcoming ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States on the constitutionality of the federal Defense of Marriage Act.</p>
<p>To read the full article, <a href="http://www.mwe.com/Employers-Should-Review-How-Plan-Documents-Define-Spouse-in-Light-of-Recent-Benefits-Litigation-04-29-2013/?PublicationTypes=d9093adb-e95d-4f19-819a-f0bb5170ab6d">click here</a>.</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MWE-EmployeeBenefitsBlog/~4/O0fu-fvAVs4" height="1" width="1">]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/employers-should-review-how-plan-documents-define-spouse-in-light-of-recent-benefits-litigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employee Benefits Issues in Spin-Offs</title>
		<link>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/employee-benefits-issues-in-spin-offs/</link>
		<comments>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/employee-benefits-issues-in-spin-offs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 18:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>McDermott Will &#38; Emery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate spin-off]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost-sharing agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee matters agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equity awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health and Welfare Plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incentive plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spinco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.employeebenefitsblog.com/2013/05/articles/employment/employee-benefits-issues-in-spinoffs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Joseph S. Adams and Jeffrey M. Holdvogt
In a corporate spin-off, both the existing company and the new company (spinco) must consider the implications for employees, employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.&#160; Benefit plans...]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://knowledgehubnetworks.com/human-resources/employee-benefits-issues-in-spin-offs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
