by John A. Litwinski and Chris C. Scheithauer
Recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that a 401(k) plan participant who sued under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) for losses in connection with a company stock fund that suffered a drop must show losses on a “net basis” during the class period to have constitutional standing. This decision has great significance in addressing plaintiffs’ standing and class certification in so-called ERISA “stock-drop” cases, often filed after a company’s stock price falls.
Read the full article here.
By: [author-name]
This article was syndicated via RSS from: http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/MWE-EmployeeBenefitsBlog/~3/K0jgG3Ka1FA/
